䀡碼源𧵑討論準化:Cái

=Cái¹=
{{cxd-t}}
=={{discussion}}==
* '''丐'''
# ''[http://www.chunom.org/pages/genibrel/#61 Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Génibrel, J.F.M., 1898]'' uses this character for this meaning. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 16:06、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT)
# 丐 is ok - [[成員:Congdantoancau|Trần Viễn Fiơng]] ([[討論‐成員:Congdantoancau|討論]]) 16:30、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT)

* '''個'''（亇 个）

=Cái²=
{{cxd-t}}
=={{discussion}}==
* '''丐'''

* '''個'''（亇 个）
# ''[http://www.chunom.org/pages/genibrel/#61 Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Génibrel, J.F.M., 1898]'' uses this character for this meaning. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 16:06、次四、𣈜23𣎃4𢆥2014 (ICT)

=References=
* '''丐'''
# 丐 [http://goo.gl/d7UB1A] - {{fbu-tn}} {{pp|[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:42 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT)}}


* '''個'''（亇 个）
# Chinese and Japanese all use 個, it would be better to keep consistent with CJK. --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 12:30 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT)
# But in fact I want to use 亇/个. [[成員:Keepout2010|<ruby><rb>杜澎栩</rb><rp>(</rp><rt>Đỗ Bành Hủ</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby>]]（[[討論‐成員:Keepout2010|討論]]） 16:57 𣈜21𣎃1𢆥2014 (ICT)
# 個 is a perfect match both semantically and phonetically. There are some varieties of Chinese (such as Teochew) that pronounce this character as /kai/, exactly the same as this word in Vietnamese. 个 would be more suited as a possessive derived from the general measure word, such as in Shanghainese/Wu ''geh''. <span class="autosigned" style="font-size: smaller">&mdash;&mdash;討論𢟚[[威箕𧵑眾碎:𡨸記|記𠸛]]呢羅𧵑[[成員:184.56.161.162|184.56.161.162]]（[[討論‐成員:184.56.161.162|討論]]・[[特別:Contributions/184.56.161.162|㨂給]]）{{#if:03:58、次𠀧、𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2014 (UTC)|𠓨𣅶&nbsp;03:58、次𠀧、𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2014 (UTC)}}。</span>