恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「討論成員:Keepout2010」
題目𡤔：→Re: Why use 鐵 for sắt？
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) (題目𡤔：→Re: Why use 鐵 for sắt？) |
|||
| 𣳔270： | 𣳔270： | ||
== Why [[成員:Keepout2010/標準漢喃(New_List)]] was deleted? == | == Why [[成員:Keepout2010/標準漢喃(New_List)]] was deleted? == | ||
I think it is a good list, but why you annotated 廢 after it?--[[成員:Betoseha|Betoseha]] ([[討論成員:Betoseha|討論]]) 20:33, 次𠀧, 𣈜29𣎃12𢆥2015 (ICT) | I think it is a good list, but why you annotated 廢 after it?--[[成員:Betoseha|Betoseha]] ([[討論成員:Betoseha|討論]]) 20:33, 次𠀧, 𣈜29𣎃12𢆥2015 (ICT) | ||
== Re: Why use 鐵 for sắt？ == | |||
I have considered the same situation. And I've checked the pronunciation of “失”, it includes “thất” and “thắt”, which are closer to “thiết”, but not “sắt”. Then, I also checked the character for “thiết”, then I found that most dictionaries use the simplified form 鉄 for for “thiết”, which includes Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Bonet, Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Genibrel, and Da Nang Chunom Dictionary (1996). <br/>Based on the above, I assume that the simplified character 鉄 would be designed not only for “sắt”, but for both 鐵(thiết) and “sắt”. Because most dictionaries use the same Chuhannom for “thiết” and “sắt”, so I use the same traditonal form 鐵 for both “thiết” and “sắt”. If you think 鉄 is better, we can consider to use it as the standard form, but better the same Chuhannom for both “thiết” and “sắt”. | |||
<small>{{lang|zh|我也考虑到了这种情况。后来查了“失”的越文发音（thất, thắt），发现跟接近“鐵”（thiết）。之後又查了 thiết 對應的漢喃字，發現大多數字典都用了簡化的“鉄”字（包括 Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Bonet, Dictionnaire Annamite-Français Genibrel, Da Nang Chunom Dictionary (1996)）。<br/>於是我推測“鉄”應該同時是“鐵”(thiết) 和“sắt”的簡化文字。鑒於“thiết”和“sắt”在多數字典里用的是同一個字，因此我用了同一個“鐵”字表記“thiết”和“sắt”。如果你覺得“鉄”更合適，我們也可以考慮用它做為標準字，但我個人覺得“thiết”和“sắt”都用同一個字好。}}</small>--[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 15:59, 次𠀧, 𣈜23𣎃2𢆥2016 (ICT) | |||