恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「討論成員:SaigonSarang」
→Why use 鐵 for sắt?
Keepout2010 (討論 | 㨂𢵰) (題目𡤔:→Why use 鐵 for sắt?) |
Keepout2010 (討論 | 㨂𢵰) |
||
𣳔10: | 𣳔10: | ||
== Why use 鐵 for sắt? == | == Why use 鐵 for sắt? == | ||
In both Dictionnaire Annamite-Français and Dictionnaire Annamite-Français, sắt is written as 鉄. I think that this character is not a "俗字" of "鐵" but a new phono-semantic compound characters (形聲字): 金 as radical and 失 as phonetic. | |||
<br/>兩字典中 sắt 都作「鉄」。我認爲此字並非「鐵」之俗字,而是「從金,失聲」的一個喃字,只是恰好和漢字文化圈內其他地區的「鐵」俗字同形了而已。--[[成員:Keepout2010|<ruby><rb>杜澎栩</rb><rp>(</rp><rt>Đỗ Bành Hủ</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby>]]([[討論‐成員:Keepout2010|討論]]) 13:28, 次𠀧, 𣈜23𣎃2𢆥2016 (ICT) | |||
:Re: Understood. Now I think it's reasonable. One thing interesting: ''From Proto-Vietic *k-rac (“iron”). Perhaps a borrowing from Old Chinese 鐵/铁 (SV: thiết); compare Proto-Sino-Tibetan *hljak. '' This means that they are probably cognates and now they share a same character again lol. --[[成員:Keepout2010|<ruby><rb>杜澎栩</rb><rp>(</rp><rt>Đỗ Bành Hủ</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby>]]([[討論‐成員:Keepout2010|討論]]) 18:58, 次𠀧, 𣈜23𣎃2𢆥2016 (ICT) |