討論成員:SaigonSarang
Re: Quocngu-Hannom Converter Feedback
All words checked and updated. I'll send a new version soon. Thanks and I'm willing to see more corrections! ----
Re: Why 成員:Keepout2010/標準漢喃(New_List) was deleted?
In fact I don't mean that the content is useless. Instead, I've archived them in my PC just for a republish with a complete list of Han-Noms. What is abolished is just some choice of characters, not the explanation after them. I'm now a kind of busy so I'll publish it later. Or, you can help me to sort it out in a complete A-Z list if possible.
- New chosen characters in a complete list are here. You can refer the format that was used in 成員:Keepout2010/標準漢喃(New_List) to start the work. I'll also start it soon.
杜澎栩 （討論） 01:29, 次𠀧, 𣈜5𣎃1𢆥2016 (ICT)
Why use 鐵 for sắt？
In both Dictionnaire Annamite-Français and Dictionnaire Annamite-Français, sắt is written as 鉄. I think that this character is not a "俗字" of "鐵" but a new phono-semantic compound characters (形聲字): 金 as radical and 失 as phonetic.
兩字典中 sắt 都作「鉄」。我認爲此字並非「鐵」之俗字，而是「從金，失聲」的一個喃字，只是恰好和漢字文化圈內其他地區的「鐵」俗字同形了而已。--
- Re: Understood. Now I think it's reasonable. One thing interesting: From Proto-Vietic *k-rac (“iron”). Perhaps a borrowing from Old Chinese 鐵／铁 (SV: thiết); compare Proto-Sino-Tibetan *hljak. This means that they are probably cognates and now they share a same character again lol. --
杜澎栩 （討論） 18:58, 次𠀧, 𣈜23𣎃2𢆥2016 (ICT)
易「城舖」爲「城庯」之議
可參考此處。-
余編輯之論據亦同上，望斟酌定奪。-七个点 (討論) 23:33, 次𠄼, 𣈜11𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07)
- Thanks for the explanation. Is 庯 here a Chunom or Chuhan?--SaigonSarang (討論) 11:50, 次𦉱, 𣈜27𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07)
- Yes, I saw 庯 in the source you just provided, and the articles are in Classical Chinese. So it probably a Chuhan. And, do you think 庯 is a Variant character of another Chuhan? @Keepout2010
君將板母:歡迎置於余“成員頁”為何故？
余不解甚矣。-七个点 (討論) 23:44, 次𠄼, 𣈜11𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07)
- Sorry for the mistake. I've revised it. Thanks.--SaigonSarang (討論) 11:46, 次𦉱, 𣈜27𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07)