恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「討論:總產品內地」

番版𣅶20:55、𣈜21𣎃3𢆥2014

Actually, 産 is right. You can find out it in [1]. If you search with 產, you couldn't find anything.

I think 產 is traditional Chinese character, while 産 is Japanese shinjitai (新字体), and 产 is simplified Chinese character (简体字). You can take a reference here: [2]. Nomfoundation makes mistakes sometimes.
By the way, Thank you so much for your contribution! We encourage you to register, it is very simple, and it will improve your editing experience. :) --SaigonSarang (討論) 20:54、次𦒹、𣈜21𣎃3𢆥2014 (ICT)

@@ 𣳔3： / 𣳔3： @@
 Actually, 産 is right. You can find out it in [http://www.nomfoundation.org/nom-tools/Nom-Lookup-Tool/Nom-Lookup-Tool]. If you search with 產, you couldn't find anything.
-* I think 產 is traditional Chinese character, while 産 is Japanese shinjitai (新字体), and 产 is simplified Chinese character (简体字). You can take a reference here: [http://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/產]. Nomfoundation makes mistakes sometimes.
+* I think 產 is traditional Chinese character, while 産 is Japanese shinjitai (新字体), and 产 is simplified Chinese character (简体字). You can take a reference here: [http://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/產]. Nomfoundation makes mistakes sometimes.<br/>By the way, Thank you so much for your contribution! We encourage you to register, it is very simple, and it will improve your editing experience. :) --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 20:54、次𦒹、𣈜21𣎃3𢆥2014 (ICT)
-By the way, Thank you so much for your contribution! We encourage you to register, it is very simple, and it will improve your editing experience. :) --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論‐成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 20:54、次𦒹、𣈜21𣎃3𢆥2014 (ICT)