恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「討論成員:SaigonSarang」
→易「城舖」爲「城庯」之議
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) n (→易「城舖」爲「城庯」之議) |
Keepout2010 (討論 | 㨂𢵰) |
||
| 𣳔27： | 𣳔27： | ||
: Yes, I saw 庯 in the source you just provided, and the articles are in Classical Chinese. So it probably a Chuhan. And, do you think 庯 is a [[:wikipedia:Variant Chinese character|Variant character]] of another Chuhan? {{@|Keepout2010|p=}} --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 11:13, 主日, 𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07) | : Yes, I saw 庯 in the source you just provided, and the articles are in Classical Chinese. So it probably a Chuhan. And, do you think 庯 is a [[:wikipedia:Variant Chinese character|Variant character]] of another Chuhan? {{@|Keepout2010|p=}} --[[成員:SaigonSarang|SaigonSarang]] ([[討論成員:SaigonSarang|討論]]) 11:13, 主日, 𣈜28𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07) | ||
::In Chinese there're just examples with completely different meanings [http://ytenx.org/kyonh/dzih/2844/ Example 1][http://www.zdic.net/z/19/kx/5EAF.htm Example 2]. Anyway, 舗/鋪 don't have an variant written as 庯. Another point I need to say is that I did not change the original text when I reprinted an article from the wiki incubator years ago, and neither did I study it. This may be the reason that later participants also used this character. I think since there are enough evidences, it's reasonable to use a character that has more support.漢文「庯」諸義皆遠殊於「舗/鋪」，不似其異體。初余未攷其字，直錄漢喃於 Wiki Incubator，後之覽者以爲正字，以是未嘗更易也。今既存文獻，當循其本。--[[成員:Keepout2010|<ruby><rb>杜澎栩</rb><rp>(</rp><rt>Đỗ Bành Hủ</rt><rp>)</rp></ruby>]]（[[討論‐成員:Keepout2010|討論]]） 02:17, 次𠀧, 𣈜30𣎃1𢆥2018 (+07) | |||
== 君將[[板母:歡迎]]置於余“成員頁”為何故？ == | == 君將[[板母:歡迎]]置於余“成員頁”為何故？ == | ||