恪別𡧲版𢯢𢷮𧵑「成員:SaigonSarang/note」
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) |
SaigonSarang (討論 | 㨂𢵰) |
||
| 𣳔17： | 𣳔17： | ||
==Should simplified components be adopted in Standard Chunom?== | ==Should simplified components be adopted in Standard Chunom?== | ||
1. ALL simplified Chunom components (usually a Chuhan or a part of a Chuhan | 1. ALL simplified Chunom components (usually a Chuhan or a part of a Chuhan) should be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁵; môn (鍆 钔)→钔 ...】 | ||
2. SOME frequently used simplified Chunom components with reasonable simplification should be adopted | 2. SOME frequently used simplified Chunom components with reasonable simplification should be adopted as part of a Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】 | ||
3. Simplified Chunom components should NEVER be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. 】 | 3. Simplified Chunom components should NEVER be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→瀧; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】 | ||
番版𣅶15:10、𣈜4𣎃12𢆥2013
Hello!
Noms need to be discussed
- gửi
- cũng
- lựa
- cần
- để
- đóng góp
Should simplified components be adopted in Standard Chunom?
1. ALL simplified Chunom components (usually a Chuhan or a part of a Chuhan) should be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁵; môn (鍆 钔)→钔 ...】
2. SOME frequently used simplified Chunom components with reasonable simplification should be adopted as part of a Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】
3. Simplified Chunom components should NEVER be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→瀧; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】