𨀈𬧐內容
呈單正
呈單正
轉𨖅錆邊
隱
調向
張正
𠊝𢷮近低
張偶然
助𢴇
顯示吧入 Hiển thị và Nhập
風𡨸漢喃 Phông chữ Hán Nôm
部𢫈漢喃 Bộ gõ Hán Nôm
工具轉字 Công cụ chuyển tự
𡨸漢喃準 Chữ Hán Nôm chuẩn
榜𡨸漢喃準常用 Bảng chữ Hán Nôm chuẩn Thường dùng
榜𡨸翻音 Bảng chữ Phiên âm
名冊各詞摱憑𡨸漢喃準 Danh sách các từ mượn bằng chữ Hán Nôm chuẩn
向引編輯 Hướng dẫn Biên tập
定樣排𢪏 Định dạng bài viết
捐𢵰 Quyên góp
衆碎懃伴𢴇扡 Chúng tôi cần bạn giúp đỡ
尋檢
尋檢
造財款
登入
工具個人
造財款
登入
䀡碼源𧵑成員:SaigonSarang/note
張成員
討論
㗂越
讀
䀡碼源
䀡歷史
工具
工具
轉𨖅錆邊
隱
作務
讀
䀡碼源
䀡歷史
終
各連結𦤾低
𠊝𢷮連關
㨂𢵰𧵑𠊛用
日程
䀡𡖡𠊛用
張特別
通信張
←
成員:SaigonSarang/note
伴空得權𢯢𢷮張尼、爲理由𢖖󠄁:
只仍成員𥪝𡖡
成員通常
㵋得寔現操作尼。
伴吻固体䀡吧抄劄碼源𧵑張尼。
==ㄚㄅㄠㄊ== Hello! 面黒主義で変態志向·哲人志向の中國系東亜人による、鍵語は「愛と自由」「エロかわ」「花鳥風月」「酸甜苦辣鹹」「越境·脱禁忌·脱構築」☆東亜·中華·扶桑·高麗·安南を楽しむQ。東亜内外の美♀、論客、皮肉屋、煽り屋、愉快犯ども大歓迎。お子CHAMAとU^_^Uは入場禁止。 ==Nom need to be discussed== * {{s|gửi}} * {{s|cũng}} * {{s|lựa}} * {{s|cần}} * {{s|để}} * {{s|đóng góp}}<sup>{{s|đóng}} {{s|góp}}</sup> ==Should simplified components be adopted in Standard Chunom?== 1. ALL simplified Chunom components (usually a Chuhan or a part of a Chuhan) should be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁵; môn (鍆 钔)→钔 ...】 2. SOME frequently used simplified Chunom components with reasonable simplification should be adopted as part of a Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→滝; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】 3. Simplified Chunom components should NEVER be adopted in Standard Chunom. 【e.g. sông (滝 瀧)→瀧; giữa (𠁵 𠁹)→𠁹; môn (鍆 钔)→鍆 ...】 ==Why Standardization== '''[https://www.facebook.com/xiaomingw Wang XM]''': I'd like to kindly remind you of the title of this group, and the vision of many of its associated groups. This group is not about keeping Nom limited to a dead writing system studied "simply out of scholarly curiosity". It is about eventually restoring Nom's former status, at least as a serious, modern, legitimate alternative writing system for the Vietnamese language. A writing system cannot seriously gain official status unless it is standardised; no modern country with its own national language has gone without spelling reform. I'd also disagree with your view of 'richness'. Certainly, the English language did not diminish in richness since Shakespeare's time, despite the fact that English spelling variants were very common back then. In fact, it was one of the contributors to mass literacy of English, and increased the frequency of literary compositions in the English language, allowing more wonderful additions to the existing body of literature. The more minds that can read and write in Nom, the more chance that you'll procure a literary genius, and it is the work of these geniuses that contribute to the diversity of the language, wouldn't you agree? November 13 at 12:49pm [https://www.facebook.com/groups/227657444504/permalink/10152204607564505/]
各板㑄用𥪝張尼:
板㑄:Cquote
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Enw
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Ew
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Ir
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Lang
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:R
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Round8-waiting
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:Round8 seed
(
䀡碼源
)
板㑄:S
(
䀡碼源
)
𢮿徠
成員:SaigonSarang/note
。
轉𢷮朝㢅內容界限